|
Dr. M.S. Lilburn, Ohio State University/OARDC recently completed
a study on protein quality trials entitled, Protein
Quality of Whole Spent Hens co-Extruded with Corn or Wheat Compared
with Soybean Meal or Meat and Bone Meal.
Dr. Lilburn's report states -
"While the diets containing CHM (Corn Hen Meal), WHM (Wheat
Hen Meal), and SBM (soybean meal), had varying effects on intake
and body weight gain, there was only small but inconsistent differences
between these three sources of protein when the data from all protein
levels was considered (see Table 7, below and attached chart). All
three proteins gave far superior PER (Protein Efficiency Ratio)
and NPR (Net Protein Ratio) responses when compared with MBM (Meat
and Bone Meal)."
|
Table 7. The Effect of Source of Protein
on PER and NPR
|
| |
PER% CP
|
|
NPR% CP
|
|
SOURCES
|
12
|
15
|
18
|
|
12
|
15
|
18
|
|
MBM c1
|
0.90
|
1.35
|
1.37
|
MBM b
|
1.60
|
1.93
|
1.76
|
|
SBM ab
|
2.71
|
2.85
|
3.16
|
SBM a
|
3.23
|
3.26
|
3.38
|
|
CHM a
|
3.27
|
3.12
|
2.90
|
CHM a
|
3.62
|
3.45
|
3.15
|
|
WHM b
|
3.03
|
2.80
|
2.75
|
WHM a
|
3.46
|
3.14
|
3.08
|
1 Different letters within a column represent significant
differences within sources of protein.
Dr Lilburn's summary of these trials --
"The extruded corn and wheat-hen diets were of similar
protein quality to soybean meal when compared in an in vivo bioassay
and were significantly better than meat and bone meal. Amino acid
digestibility was approximately 80% for the indispensable amino
acids of greatest interest (methionine, lysine, tryptophan, arginine)
but was only 70% for threonine."
Results of the study regarding the illeal amino acid digestabilities
of the CHM, WHM, and MBM diets are shown in table 9. While MBM diets
were relatively high in OH-proline (specific to collagen) the illeal
amino acid digestibility for this MBM compared closely to that reported
by other researchers for broilers.
|
|
|
Dietary AA
|
MBM DIG
|
CHM DIG
|
WHM
DIG
|
Dietary AA
|
MBM DIG
|
CHM DIG
|
WHM
DIG
|
|
OH-Proline
|
0.63
|
0.65
|
0.54
|
Leucine
|
0.64
|
0.78
|
0.78
|
|
OH-Lysine
|
0.48
|
0.59
|
0.54
|
Tyrosine
|
0.60
|
0.80
|
0.77
|
|
Threonine
|
0.51
|
0.69
|
0.70
|
Phenylalanine
|
0.63
|
0.78
|
0.78
|
|
Serine
|
0.53
|
0.66
|
0.68
|
Histidine
|
0.59
|
0.80
|
0.80
|
|
Cysteine
|
0.39
|
0.54
|
0.51
|
Lysine
|
0.58
|
0.81
|
0.82
|
|
Methionine
|
0.63
|
0.84
|
0.83
|
Arginine
|
0.68
|
0.81
|
0.81
|
|
Valine
|
0.60
|
0.64
|
0.75
|
Tryptophan
|
0.63
|
0.80
|
0.77
|
|
Isoleucine
|
0.58
|
0.76
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
|
These experimental studies conducted by Ohio State researchers
and other studies demonstrate the protein quality and important
nutritional value that Extruded Poultry Meal can contribute to livestock
feed formulation. Ongoing laboratory analysis of the Extruded Poultry
Meal produced by Great Plains Proteins will assure a consistent
and cost effective feed ingredient. --- George M. Speers, Ph
D., Nutritionist.
Protein Efficiency Ratio
(gm BW gain/gm protein intake)
from alternative protein sources

Legend
M/B - Meat and Bone Meal
SBM - Soybean Meal
CHM - Corn and Chicken Meal
WHM - Wheat and Chicken Meal |
Source - M.S. Lilburn, Ohio State University
|